Disinfotainment Today

Presents
Issue #2.03
of the new Los Angeles Free Press



Google
WWW Disinfotainment Today


 
The Editorial We
by Michael Dare
 

This week presented a unique problem. In one article called 1984 Quote of the Week, we make fun of the professional historical revisionists at the White House who had the hilarious task of changing the official record of George W. Bush's speech to a bunch of school kids from "childrens do learn"  to something in English. Then we found ourselves in possession of a transcript of a speech from Daniel Ellsberg which had a few grammatical errors of its own. Halfway through doing our job, editing the Ellsberg piece, we realized we were doing exactly what the White House was doing, only to a different degree. We weren't making an idiot sound intelligent, we were making an intelligent man sound MORE intelligent, but still, were we being hypocrites, contradicting ourselves in a blatantly biased manner? In the interest of truth in journalism and giving ourselves less work, we've decided to present the Ellsberg speech unedited, so if there's anything wrong with it, you know who to blame.
 
In our search for a Native American to nominate as president of the United States, we came across Thomas Banyacya Sr., an elder of the Hopi Nation who died in 1999. He wrote something we're reprinting because everyone needs to be reminded that a dead Indian would make a better president than the current selection of candidates.
 
The same people who lied to us about Saddam Hussein to justify an illegal war against Iraq have ramped up the propaganda machine against Mahmoud Ahmedinejad to justify an illegal war against Iran. Dave Brice explains who's going to get the Last Laugh.
 
Speaking of irrational, last year 829,625 of the 300 million people who smoke pot were arrested, the largest number in history. Read The War Against Plants for the whole tale from NORML, plus a Free Press Challenge to Paris Hilton to come out of the pot closet and join the hemp movement.
 
We proudly nominate Pete Seeger for the Nobel Peace Prize. We SHALL overcome.
 
Lynette Sheffield continues to bravely dive into the worst assignment in journalistic history, Bad Food, with this week's hideous offering, Slurpees. Be very afraid.
 
As if that weren't enough, we got a High Coup, a rude question for biblical scholars, a Free Ad, an invitation to a free concert, a History Lesson from Hell, the uncut tape of Mr. "please don't tase me," an online gallery of sensational aerial photography of Extreme Rich/Poor Divides, a Quiz of the Week, a Google Smackdown, some good books to Read Responsibly, Don't Take Our Word for It, and a new travel column by David Schoen called Don't Go, You'll Ruin it.
 
Good advise. Don't go anywhere until you've read the entire issue.
 
MD
 
Daniel Ellsberg is the former Defense Department analyst who leaked the secret Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War. He offered insights into the looming war with Iran and the loss of liberty in the United States at an American University symposium on Sept. 20.

 
 
If there's another 9/11 under this regime it means that they switch on full extent all the apparatus of a police state that has been patiently constructed, largely secretly at first but eventually leaked out and known and accepted by the Democratic people in Congress, by the Republicans and so forth.
 
Will there be anything left for NSA to increase its surveillance of us? They may be to the limit of their technical capability now, or they may not. But if they're not now they will be after another 9/11.
 
And I would say after the Iranian retaliation to an American attack on Iran, you will then see an increased attack on Iran an escalation which will be also accompanied by a total suppression of dissent in this country, including detention camps.
 
It's a little hard for me to distinguish the two contingencies; they could come together. Another 9/11 or an Iranian attack in which Iran's reaction against Israel, against our shipping, against our troops in Iraq above all, possibly in this country, will justify the full panoply of measures that have been prepared now, legitimized, and to some extent written into law.
 
This is an unusual gang, even for Republicans. [But] I think that the successors to this regime are not likely to roll back the assault on the Constitution. They will take advantage of it, they will exploit it.
 
Will Hillary Clinton as president decide to turn off NSA after the last five years of illegal surveillance? Will she deprive her administration her ability to protect United States citizens from possible terrorism by blinding herself and deafening herself to all that NSA can provide? I don't think so.
 
Unless this somehow, by a change in our political climate, of a radical change, unless this gets rolled back in the next year or two before a new administration comes in and there's no move to do this at this point unless that happens I don't see it happening under the next administration, whether Republican or Democratic.
 
The Next Coup

Let me simplify this and not just to be rhetorical: A coup has occurred. I woke up the other day realizing, coming out of sleep, that a coup has occurred. It's not just a question that a coup lies ahead with the next 9/11. That's the next coup, that completes the first.
The last five years have seen a steady assault on every fundamental of our Constitution, what the rest of the world looked at for the last 200 years as a model and experiment to the rest of the world in checks and balances, limited government, Bill of Rights, individual rights protected from majority infringement by the Congress, an independent judiciary, the possibility of impeachment.
 
There have been violations of these principles by many presidents before. Most of the specific things that Bush has done in the way of illegal surveillance and other matters were done under my boss Lyndon Johnson in the Vietnam War: the use of CIA, FBI, NSA against Americans.
 
I could go through a list going back before this century to Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus in the Civil War, and before that the Alien and Sedition Acts in the 18th century. I think that none of those presidents were in fact what I would call quite precisely the current administration: domestic enemies of the Constitution.
 
I think that none of these presidents with all their violations, which were impeachable had they been found out at the time and in nearly every case their violations were not found out until they were out of office so we didn't have the exact challenge that we have today.
 
That was true with the first term of Nixon and certainly of Johnson, Kennedy and others. They were impeachable, they weren't found out in time, but I think it was not their intention to in the crisis situations that they felt justified their actions, to change our form of government.
 
It is increasingly clear with each new book and each new leak that comes out, that Richard Cheney and his now chief of staff David Addington have had precisely that in mind since at least the early 70s. Not just since 1992, not since 2001, but have believed in Executive government, single-branch government under an Executive president elected or not with unrestrained powers. They did not believe in restraint.
 
When I say this I'm not saying they are traitors. I don't think they have in mind allegiance to some foreign power or have a desire to help a foreign power. I believe they have in their own minds a love of this country and what they think is best for this country but what they think is best is directly and consciously at odds with what the Founders of this country and Constitution thought.
 
They believe we need a different kind of government now, an Executive government essentially, rule by decree, which is what we're getting with signing statements. Signing statements are talked about as line-item vetoes which is one [way] of describing them which are unconstitutional in themselves, but in other ways are just saying the president says "I decide what I enforce. I decide what the law is. I legislate."
 
It's [the same] with the military commissions, courts that are under the entire control of the Executive Branch, essentially of the president. A concentration of legislative, judicial, and executive powers in one branch, which is precisely what the Founders meant to avert, and tried to avert and did avert to the best of their ability in the Constitution.
 
The Founders Had It Right

Now I'm appealing to that as a crisis right now not just because it is a break in tradition but because I believe in my heart and from my experience that on this point the Founders had it right.
 
It's not just "our way of doing things" it was a crucial perception on the corruption of power to anybody including Americans. On procedures and institutions that might possibly keep that power under control because the alternative was what we have just seen, wars like Vietnam, wars like Iraq, wars like the one coming.
 
That brings me to the second point. This Executive Branch, under specifically Bush and Cheney, despite opposition from most of the rest of the branch, even of the cabinet, clearly intends a war against Iran which even by imperialist standards, standards in other words which were accepted not only by nearly everyone in the Executive Branch but most of the leaders in Congress. The interests of the empire, the need for hegemony, our right to control and our need to control the oil of the Middle East and many other places. That is consensual in our establishment.
 
But even by those standards, an attack on Iran is insane. And I say that quietly, I don't mean it to be heard as rhetoric. Of course it's not only aggression and a violation of international law, a supreme international crime, but it is by imperial standards, insane in terms of the consequences.
 
Does that make it impossible? No, it obviously doesn't, it doesn't even make it unlikely.
That is because two things come together that with the acceptance for various reasons of the Congress Democrats and Republicans and the public and the media, we have freed the White House the president and the vice president from virtually any restraint by Congress, courts, media, public, whatever.
 
And on the other hand, the people who have this unrestrained power are crazy. Not entirely, but they have crazy beliefs.
 
And the question is what then, what can we do about this? We are heading towards an insane operation. It is not certain. It is likely. I want to try to be realistic myself here, to encourage us to do what we must do, what is needed to be done with the full recognition of the reality. Nothing is impossible.
 
What I'm talking about in the way of a police state, in the way of an attack on Iran is not certain. Nothing is certain, actually. However, I think it is probable, more likely than not, that in the next 15, 16 months of this administration we will see an attack on Iran. Probably. Whatever we do.
 
And we will not succeed in moving Congress probably, and Congress probably will not stop the president from doing this. And that's where we're heading. That's a very ugly, ugly prospect.
 
However, I think it's up to us to work to increase that small perhaps anyway not large possibility and probability to avert this within the next 15 months, aside from the effort that we have to make for the rest of our lives.
 
Restoring the Republic

Getting back the constitutional government and improving it will take a long time. And I think if we don't get started now, it won't be started under the next administration.
Getting out of Iraq will take a long time. Averting Iran and averting a further coup in the face of a 9/11, another attack, is for right now, it can't be put off. It will take a kind of political and moral courage of which we have seen very little
 
We have a really unusual concentration here and in this audience, of people who have in fact changed their lives, changed their position, lost their friends to a large extent, risked and experienced being called terrible names, "traitor," "weak on terrorism" names that politicians will do anything to avoid being called.
 
How do we get more people in the government and in the public at large to change their lives now in a crisis in a critical way? How do we get Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid for example? What kinds of pressures, what kinds of influences can be brought to bear to get Congress to do their jobs? It isn't just doing their jobs. Getting them to obey their oaths of office.

I took an oath many times, an oath of office as a Marine lieutenant, as an official in the Defense Department, as an official in the State Department as a Foreign Service officer. A number of times I took an oath of office which is the same oath office taken by every member of Congress and every official in the United States and every officer in the United States armed services.
 
And that oath is not to a Commander in Chief, which is not mentioned. It is not to a fuehrer. It is not even to superior officers. The oath is precisely to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States.
 
Now that is an oath I violated every day for years in the Defense Department without realizing it when I kept my mouth shut when I knew the public was being lied into a war as they were lied into Iraq, as they are being lied into war in Iran.

I knew that I had the documents that proved it, and I did not put it out then. I was not obeying my oath which I eventually came to do.
 
I've often said that Lt. Ehren Watada who still faces trial for refusing to obey orders to deploy to Iraq which he correctly perceives to be an unconstitutional and aggressive war is the single officer in the United States armed services who is taking seriously in upholding his oath.
 
The president is clearly violating that oath, of course. Everybody under him who understands what is going on and there are myriad, are violating their oaths. And that's the standard that I think we should be asking of people.
 
Congressional Courage

On the Democratic side, on the political side, I think we should be demanding of our Democratic leaders in the House and Senate and frankly of the Republicans that it is not their highest single absolute priority to be reelected or to maintain a Democratic majority so that Pelosi can still be Speaker of the House and Reid can be in the Senate, or to increase that majority.
 
I'm not going to say that for politicians they should ignore that, or that they should do something else entirely, or that they should not worry about that.
 
Of course that will be and should be a major concern of theirs, but they're acting like it's their sole concern. Which is business as usual. "We have a majority, let's not lose it, let's keep it. Let's keep those chairmanships." Exactly what have those chairmanships done for us to save the Constitution in the last couple of years?
 
I am shocked by the Republicans today that I read in the Washington Post who yesterday threatened a filibuster if we get back habeas corpus. The ruling out of habeas corpus with the help of the Democrats did not get us back to George the First it got us back to before King John 700 years ago in terms of counter-revolution.
 
We need some way, and Ann Wright has one way, of sitting in, in Conyers office and getting arrested. Ray McGovern has been getting arrested, pushed out the other day for saying the simple words "swear him in" when it came to testimony.
 
I think we've got to somehow get home to them [in Congress] that this is the time for them to uphold the oath, to preserve the Constitution, which is worth struggling for in part because it's only with the power that the Constitution gives Congress responding to the public, only with that can we protect the world from mad men in power in the White House who intend an attack on Iran.
 
And the current generation of American generals and others who realize that this will be a catastrophe have not shown themselves they might be people who in their past lives risked their bodies and their lives in Vietnam or elsewhere, like [Colin] Powell, and would not risk their career or their relation with the president to the slightest degree.
 
That has to change. And it's the example of people like those up here who somehow brought home to our representatives that they as humans and as citizens have the power to do likewise and find in themselves the courage to protect this country and protect the world. Thank you.
 
 

Daniel Ellsberg is author of Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers.
 
Last Laugh
by Dave Brice

I don't feel like adding to the hundreds of thousands of words that have already been written, spoken, and spouted concerning Ahmedinejad's visit to New York this past week and the domestic hatefest it generated. It's enough to say that the president of Iran has now been designated our current Satan incarnate, and that Saddam Hussein has a worthy successor, and one whose country contains almost as much petroleum as the dead dictator's.
 
I'll leave it to Dennis Perrin to sum up (from his blogpost at dennisperrin.blogspot.com,  Booga! Booga!): "(W)hat (Ahmedinejad) says isn't important. He's merely an archetype that American politicians and their media megaphones can pelt with self-serving garbage. From Romney, to Hillary, to Rudy, to Pious Joe Lieberman, no one can overstate their case. The wilder, the better. In fact, I'd wager that Ahmadinejad is playing these and like-minded Americans for howling chumps. His ever-present grin is a giveaway."
 
Besides setting off ten thousand cable news replays of the two-minutes' hate, Ahmedinejad's visit was the subject of countless debates in internet discussion groups. It was at one of these I found myself entangled with a poster who referred to the Iranian prez as "subhuman scum," condemned him for homophobia among other things, then loftily opined that "some cultures are better than other cultures." I had to agree.
 
You have to wonder about cultures that don't lose old habits and attitudes that imperil their own survival. The Romans, for example, just kept on expanding their empire and making new enemies. It wasn't the smartest thing to do, in the long run.   
 
An Associated Press story on the financial page on Thursday, 9/27, provided an example of what I'm talking about.
 
"Oil and other petroleum futures surged Thursday amid supply concerns sparked by a decline in crude inventories at a key Oklahoma terminal and the confrontation between the West and Iran."
 
So with oil at record high prices, we invite the prez of one of the world's largest oil-exporting countries over here so we can take target practice at him.
 
The A.P. story continues: "Many traders are betting the West will take action against Iran before the end of the year, and worry that economic sanctions or a military strike will result in the disruption of oil supplies from the Middle East."
 
It's the mark of a superior culture I guess. Having allowed itself to become addicted to petroleum, the political arm of said culture responds by shooting itself in the gas tank.
 
 

You have been telling the people,
That this is the eleventh hour.
Now, you must go and tell the people,
That THIS is the hour,
And there are things to be considered.
 
Where are you living? What are you doing?
What are your relationships?
Are you in the right relationship?
Where is your water?
 
Know your garden ...
 
It is time to speak your truth.
Create your community,
Be good to each other.
Do not look outside yourself for a leader.
 
There is a river flowing now very fast,
It is so great and swift.
That there are those who will be afraid,
They will try to hold onto the shore.
They will feel they are being pulled apart,
And will suffer greatly.
 
Understand that the river knows its destination,
The elders say we must let go of the shore.
Push off into the middle of the river,
Keep our eyes open and our heads above water.
 
And I say; see who is in there with you,
Hold fast to them and celebrate!
 
At this time in history,
We are to take nothing personally.
Least of all, ourselves!
For the moment we do,
Our spiritual growth and journey comes to an end.
 
The time of the Lone Wolf is over!
 
Gather yourselves!
 
Banish the word "struggle" from
Your attitude and vocabulary.
All that we do now must be done,
In a sacred manner and in celebration.
 
We are all about to go on a journey,
We are the ones we have been waiting for!
 
 
The War Against Plants
YEAR MARIJUANA ARRESTS
2006 829,625
2005 786,545
2004 771,608
2003 755,187
2002 697,082
2001 723,627
2000 734,498
1999 704,812
1998 682,885
1997 695,200
1996 641,642
1995 588,963
1994 499,122
1993 380,689
1992 342,314
1991 287,850
1990 326,850
 
    Police arrested a record 829,625 persons for marijuana violations in 2006, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's annual Uniform Crime Report, released today. This is the largest total number of annual arrests for pot ever recorded by the FBI. Marijuana arrests now comprise nearly 44 percent of all drug arrests in the United States.
    "These numbers belie the myth that police do not target and arrest minor marijuana offenders," said NORML Executive Director Allen St. Pierre, who noted that at current rates, a marijuana smoker is arrested every 38 seconds in America. "This effort is a tremendous waste of criminal justice resources that diverts law enforcement personnel away from focusing on serious and violent crime, including the war on terrorism."
    Of those charged with marijuana violations, approximately 89 percent some 738,915 Americans were charged with possession only. The remaining 90,710 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that includes all cultivation offenses even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use. In past years, roughly 30 percent of those arrested were age 19 or younger.
    "Present policies have done little if anything to decrease marijuana's availability or dissuade youth from trying it," St. Pierre said, noting young people in the U.S. now frequently report that they have easier access to pot than alcohol or tobacco.
    “Two other major points standout from today’s record marijuana arrests: Overall, there has been a dramatic 188 percent increase in marijuana arrests in the last 15 years -- yet the public's access to pot remains largely unfettered and the self-reported use of cannabis remains largely unchanged. Second, America’s Midwest is decidedly the hotbed for marijuana-related arrests with 57 percent of all marijuana-related arrests. The region of America with the least amount of marijuana-related arrests is the West with 30 percent. This latter result is arguably a testament to the passage of various state and local decriminalization efforts over the past several years.”
    The total number of marijuana arrests in the U.S. for 2006 far exceeded the total number of arrests in the U.S. for all violent crimes combined, including murder, manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault.
    Annual marijuana arrests have nearly tripled since the early 1990s.
    "Arresting hundreds of thousands of Americans who smoke marijuana responsibly needlessly destroys the lives of otherwise law abiding citizens," St. Pierre said, adding that over 8 million Americans have been arrested on marijuana charges in the past ten years. During this same time, arrests for cocaine and heroin have declined sharply, implying that increased enforcement of marijuana laws is being achieved at the expense of enforcing laws against the possession and trafficking of more dangerous drugs.
    St. Pierre concluded: "Enforcing marijuana prohibition costs taxpayers between $10 billion and $12 billion annually and has led to the arrest of nearly 20 million Americans. Nevertheless, some 94 million Americans acknowledge having used marijuana during their lives. It makes no sense to continue to treat nearly half of all Americans as criminals for their use of a substance that poses no greater - and arguably far fewer - health risks than alcohol or tobacco. A better and more sensible solution would be to tax and regulate cannabis in a manner similar to alcohol and tobacco."
 
- NORML -
 
 
 

An Open Letter to Paris Hilton
 
ACTUAL YOUTUBE VIDEO
 
Okay Paris, we've seen the video of you doing something perfectly legal in Amsterdam, but if there's any implication in this video that you think there's anything wrong with the laws prohibiting this exact behavior in America, I must have missed it. Paris, if you want to rise from the position of hoax celebrity, you've got to actually do something FOR MANKIND and not for publicity or a goof or as a tax break but for the good of the people. In this video, all we hear is a typical stoned out conversation in between hits of gee, whatever it is they're selling in this coffeeshop in Amsterdam, and you blew a perfectly splendid opportunity to say something real, something vital, something you obviously believe, that there is absolutely nothing wrong with ingesting a flower, whatever it is, and that the American war against marijuana and industrial hemp is TOTALLY INSANE. Paris, haven't you got anything to say to the millions of people in jail for doing what you're doing on YouTube? Don't you, I don't know, kinda feel a little bit sorry for them? I mean they're in jail. You know what that's like. Isn't there something you could do for them?
 
You bet there is, and the LA Free Press challenges you to do it. For Christ sake, if the anti-drug war movement can't even get a stoner like you to admit such a there's nothing wrong with the herb, how will it ever rise from the ashes of the anti -Iraq war movement and actually get something done?
 
I know you don't remember but we once had a president who said this:
 
"Penalties against drug use should not be more damaging to an individual than use of the drug itself. Nowhere is this more clear than in the laws against possession of marijuana in private for personal use."
- President Jimmy Carter addressing congress, August 2, 1977 -
 
Who at the time thought wow, this guy's a wild-eyed liberal? Nobody. Now he seems like Kucinich ahead of his time. Back then, we all naturally assumed that the world was coming to its senses and voila, millions of people in the US and billions world-wide would no longer have to think of themselves as criminals just because they were fond of a plant, but the drug war continued to escalate unabated. Anybody who wants to hate Bill Clinton should get their eyes off his genitals and look at the amount of pot smokers arrested during his administration, which was the largest on record.
 
Till now, of course. Might I remind you that the exact same geniuses who cooked up the war in Iraq also cooked up the war on drugs? Shall we count the similarities? How about oil? You can actually debate whether the Iraq war was about oil, but with hemp there's no question. With hemp conveniently outlawed, DuPont made a gazillion dollars selling oil based nylon ropes to the US navy. Cooked evidence? You betcha. Thousands of lives lost for no reason. Of course. Seem like they'll never end? Gosh.
 
Come on, Paris, wise up. The war on drugs has got nothing to do with liberal vs. conservative or good vs. evil and much more to do with common sense vs. are they out of their fucking minds? What's the matter with people? They need to get their heads out of the past, when a cockamamie piece of anti-marijuana propaganda was used to pass a law to enrich William Randolph Hearst and Lammont DuPont. The laws against hemp never had anything to do with the flowers you smoke but the stalks they grow on. The flowers were just a convenient excuse to outlaw the primary competition against nylon and wood pulp. Times have changed. Now we know that hemp is not only good for rope and paper but clothing and soap and fuel and food and most of all, medicine, where it has cleared every hurtle to reveal itself as the safest medicine known to man. Yeah, that's right. Nothing safer, with thousands of legitimate uses, and so cheap you can just grow it yourself without any pesky pharmaceutical companies as middlemen.
 
Imagine this. Your baby has gotten into your medicine chest and managed to open two babyproof bottles, one of aspirin, one a pungent gooey bud of medicinal marijuana. Which one would you prefer your baby swallow? CLUE: All it takes is 15 aspirin to kill your baby. 300 people a year die from aspirin overdose. No human in the history of recorded medicine has ever died from an overdose of marijuana. Can't be done. The most your baby will get is hungry. Okay, choose.
 
Thank you for choosing common sense against outdated knowledge. You just admitted that marijuana is safer than aspirin.
 
But the hardest hurtle isn't just that there's something good about it but that there's also nothing wrong with it. Oh sure, there's abuse. Here's an idea. How about a war on abuse? Leave "use" alone. What's abuse? Before a math exam might be bad. Driving, air traffic controlling, you know, the standard situations where intoxication isn't a good idea, but in the appropriate situation, basically nothing can go wrong. Quite the opposite. While on pot, you're LESS likely to have any sort of seizure or muscular spasm. On pot, people tend to mellow out. They're LESS of a problem. It's hard for some people to get past their backward thinking, especially when decades of lying propaganda has convinced them that pot is bad, because we're not just saying it's not bad for you, we're saying it's actually good for you, and the research backs it up. It's science vs. faith all over again. You can believe some ancient text or your own lying eyes showing you deforestation and seriously ill people getting well.
 
In any case, if the current marijuana laws were actively enforced, there would be more than 300 million new prisoners in the penal system, which would just be splendid for the prison construction and prison guard industries and a catastrophe for the rest of the human race.
 
Did you know cotton farming uses more insecticide than any other crop on earth? Did you know hemp can be grown with no pesticides? Now do you need me to point out that every single article of clothing you wear that's made out of hemp instead of cotton actually reduces the amount of poison in our groundwater? C'mon, Paris, wearing clothes is one of the things you do best. But that's not the challenge. You should be doing that anyway.
 
Paris, I challenge you to give a million dollars to NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Law). What'll they do with it? Help end the madness. Let them use it to move pot smokers from prisons to your hotels. Change your bio in the history books from "celebrity slut" to "celebrity slut turned political activist." Put your money where your mouth was.
 
 
Sincerely,
 
Michael Dare
Editor: LA Free Press
 
 
 
 
Keep Your Eyes on the Prize
Martin Luther King, Pete Seeger, Charis Horton, Rosa Parks, and Ralph Abernathy, 1957
 
There are already 7290 signatures on the Petition to award Pete Seeger the Nobel Peace Prize. Good idea. Whatayuh say we give him a few thousand more. C'mon, sing along...
 
 
 
 
High Coup
 
THE SKY IS FALLING
A GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR
CHICKEN LITTLE BUSH
- zEN mAN -
 
1984 Quote of the Week
"Childrens do learn"

"As yesterday's positive report card shows, childrens do learn when standards are high and results are measured."
- George W. Bush offering a grammar lesson to a group of New York school kids while reauthorizing the No Child Left Behind Act. The flub was cleaned up by the White House in the official transcript. Yes, somebody in the White House has Winston Smith's job.
 
Calling All Biblical Scholars
 
We were reading ¡Ask a Mexican!® about Speedy Gonzales when he mysteriously quoted Howard Stern saying "God sneaked a fart joke into the Book of Isaiah," which seemed well and good, but did God REALLY sneak a fart joke into the Book of Isaiah? What was the actual biblical quote Gustavo Arellano and/or Howard Stern was talking about, or was this just some piece of blather that mysteriously entered the blogosphere masquerading as reality?
 
And so we found ourselves at http://www.judaism-religion.information-eg.com/ entering the word "fart" in the search engine. Nothing came up, so we entered the word "belch" in the search engine. You wouldn't believe what came up. ¡Ask a Mexican!®.
 
And so the magical yin/yang of internet surfing brings us full circle, back from whence we came, with only one question left.
 
Where's the fart joke in the Book of Isaiah?
 
Send your answers to stupidquestion"at"dareland.com
 
Free Concert
 
We love Hamill on Trial but he's not coming anywhere near the Palm Desert Bureau of the Los Angeles Free Press. If you can attend any of the above listed concerts, let us know and we'll mail you press credentials to get you in for free so you can write about him for us. Here's what he's like live. Go. Have a good time. Wax poetic.
 
Which Means Gore is President
 
    "Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as 'one of the most important developments in the history of science'.
    The parallel universe theory, first proposed in 1950 by the US physicist Hugh Everett, helps explain mysteries of quantum mechanics that have baffled scientists for decades, it is claimed.
    In Everett's 'many worlds' universe, every time a new physical possibility is explored, the universe splits. Given a number of possible alternative outcomes, each one is played out - in its own universe.
    "A motorist who has a near miss, for instance, might feel relieved at his lucky escape. But in a parallel universe, another version of the same driver will have been killed. Yet another universe will see the motorist recover after treatment in hospital. The number of alternative scenarios is endless.
    "It is a bizarre idea which has been dismissed as fanciful by many experts. But the new research from Oxford shows that it offers a mathematical answer to quantum conundrums that cannot be dismissed lightly - and suggests that Dr Everett, who was a Phd student at Princeton University when he came up with the theory, was on the right track...
    "According to quantum mechanics, nothing at the subatomic scale can really be said to exist until it is observed. Until then, particles occupy nebulous 'superposition' states, in which they can have simultaneous 'up' and 'down' spins, or appear to be in different places at the same time.
    "Observation appears to 'nail down' a particular state of reality, in the same way as a spinning coin can only be said to be in a 'heads' or 'tails' state once it is caught.
    "According to quantum mechanics, unobserved particles are described by 'wave functions' representing a set of multiple 'probable' states. When an observer makes a measurement, the particle then settles down into one of these multiple options.
    "The Oxford team, led by Dr David Deutsch, showed mathematically that the bush-like branching structure created by the universe splitting into parallel versions of itself can explain the probabilistic nature of quantum outcomes."
 
"We're living in the future and none of this has happened yet."
- Bruce Springsteen -
 
History Lesson from Hell
The final issue of a pacifist newspaper, Das Andere Deutschland, announcing its own
 prohibition (Verbot)  by the police authorities on the basis of the Reichstag fire decree
 
The Patriot Act Reichstag Fire Decree (Reichstagsbrandverordnung in German) is the common name of the decree issued by German president Paul von Hindenburg in direct response to the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933. The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens. With Nazis in powerful positions of the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis of imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and was used to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause. The decree is considered by historians to be one of the key steps in the establishment of a one-party Nazi state in Germany.
 
"The really dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power. They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection."
- U.S. Vice President Henry Wallace: The New York Times on April 9, 1944 -
 
Daniel Ellsberg on the Reichstag Fire Decree
and why Bush/Cheney should be Impeached for War Crimes
 
Unpleasant Reminder from The Herald, Wednesday, May 19, 2004
 
    "Politicians need to convey the impression at all times that they know what they're doing, even when they don't. That's what they're paid for, after all. But every so often the mask of competence slips. They reveal, in a flash, that they simply haven't a clue; that they're winging it, making it up as they go along, hoping no-one will notice.
    "This moment came yesterday when the government announced that it was 'full throttle' to the handover of power to an Iraqi civil administration on June 30. 'Six weeks to sovereignty' that's the message coming from the US-led coalition. We've done the job, now it's time to hand over to the grateful people of free Iraq. All we need to do, it seems, is send a few more troops to train the Iraqi military, stage elections, and then everyone can live happily ever after.
    "Sounds simple, but this promise of a handover to an Iraqi civil administration was announced less than 24 hours after Izzedin Salim, the head of the Iraqi governing council, was killed by a car bomb in Baghdad. It was announced as US troops besieged the holy city of Kerbala, and on the day Israel continued to defy the civilized world by bulldozing Palestinian homes in Gaza. 
- Iain Macwhirter:
Iraq Disaster Isn't Coming to an End, it's Only Just Begun -
 
Tasing on a Sunny Afternoon
 
 
This clip compares the complete footage with the edited CNN version, showing not just that the student was doing absolutely nothing inappropriate when the incident began, but that John Kerry had plenty of time to just say "Hey, leave him alone," and the whole thing would have been averted. Fast thinker, that Kerry.
 
Oh Goody
 
"Israel, a few days before Yom Kippur, declared that the Gaza Strip is now a 'hostile entity,' and the office of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert (who is under investigation for corruption) announced a collective-punishment plan that includes 'limiting the transfer of goods to the Gaza Strip, cutting back fuel and electricity, and restricting the movement of people to and from the Strip.' Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum condemned Israel's 'criminal, terrorist Zionist actions.' U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who recently was denied an audience with the Pope, went to Jerusalem to bring peace, and it was reported that not long ago Vice President Dick Cheney considered asking Israel to launch missiles at an Iranian nuclear site to kick-start a new war."
 
Online Gallery of the Week
 
Photos of poverty butting right up against wealth
 
 
 
Which Means Gore is President #2
 
    "About a year after the Dutch government began seriously worrying about the integrity of e-voting machines, they've literally pulled the plug on the venture. The biggest flaw was the lack of a paper trail according to a special committee which reported its finding this morning. As such, Nederlanders will return to the 'red pencil method' in upcoming elections until an automated paper-counting solution can be deployed... and then hacked.
    "Update: To be perfectly clear, the regulation allowing e-voting machines has been withdrawn - i.e., effective immediately, there is no more e-voting in the Netherlands. However, the Dutch government will make an overarching decision in the next two months 'to regain the trust of the public in our voting system.' Given that the government commissioned this study themselves, the decision is expected to be a simple rubber stamp approval."
- Dutch government abandons e-voting for red pencil -
 
Quiz of the Week
 
Which one of the civil wars we started in Iraq is going relatively better now?
 
 
A )
Sunni vs. Shia
 
B )
Sunni vs. Sunni
 
C )
Shia vs. Shia
 
D )
Kurd vs. Kurd
 
E )
Kurd vs. Arab
 
Hint: if you picked any of the above, guess again.
 
 
Free Ad
 
 
Bad Food
Slurpees
by Lynette Sheffield
 
    Did you feel it?
    Did you notice?
    Were you even paying attention?
    Tuesday, September 25th there was a satisfying "click" as the last piece of the puzzle settled into place. The world became whole, complete and at peace with the Microsoft release of Halo 3 for the Xbox 360. Once again, we are under the protection of Master Chief Petty Officer Spartan 117.
    I feel so much safer now.
    Preliminary results of the release-day sales total $170 million. But that was only for the game.
    Accessories, special Xbox consoles and multiple tie-ins also exploded on the scene.
    And, of course, there is the official Halo 3 Slurpee.
    Over 13 million Slurpees are sold each month and that is without the new, special Mountain Dew Game Fuel flavor. Billed as "Dew with an invigorating blast of citrus and cherry flavor," it was created especially for the Halo 3 game promotion.
    The Slurpee is sold in three different collectible cups. A real plus for your china hutch display.
    I tried it. I cannot recall the last time I drank Kool-Aid but drinking this Slurpee reminds me of why I quit.
    Trying to appeal to the stereotypical gamer, this Slurpee has piled on the sugar. Master Chief, when he is wearing his full body armor stands at seven feet tall and weighs half a ton. Personally, I cannot understand why the Covenant, upon seeing Master Chief Petty Officer Spartan 117 in his man suit, do not just fall over in a dead faint. I certainly would and therefore, can't imagine the virile Master Chief ever drinking a Mountain Dew Game Fuel Slurpee. I would think Spartan 117 would prefer something along the lines of a blend of muddy coffee, beef and raw eggs, you know; something that would put hair on your chest if you weren't wearing MJOLNIR body armor.
    Mountain Dew Game Fuel nutritional statement gives the ingredients in an 8-ounce serving on their website. No one drinks an 8-ounce serving of anything. Eight ounces would fill up an average Dixie cup. Halfway. Maybe.
    For the sake of argument, an 8-ounce serving of the Halo 3 Dew has 48 milligrams of caffeine. That is a little less than a Red Bull, roughly the same as a Jolt soda or cup of tea and more than twice as much as a regular Coke. Add that to the sugar content and you have one wide-awake and superbly alert Halo 3 player.
    But can you abuse caffeine? Of course, you can! There's not a chemical in existence that can't be abused in some manner and there's usually a large supply of voluntary test subjects available. Consuming too much caffeine can result in the obvious symptoms: restlessness, anxiety and insomnia as well as gastrointestinal disturbance, irregular heartbeat and hyperreflexia, the medical term for muscle twitching.
    Wow! What a hunk of sensuality you would make after a dozen or so Game Fuel Slurpees!
    There are even four caffeine-induced psychiatric disorders recognized by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Way to go, gamers!
    Being a mom, I worry. I'm really quite good at it. After I handed the brand-new Halo 3 game to my teenage son, who was standing there with boggled eyes, mouth agape and maybe a trace of a tear or two sliding down his cheeks, I became a tad concerned when I realized I had not seen him for the last four hours. I walked into our game room and saw the reason.
    My son had bonded. He was one with his Xbox 360 and it was, in turn, one with him. He held the controller in a death grip as he grimaced in a Spartan-like manner. His eyes were bloodshot and I believe it was because for the last four hours he had never blinked. I threw a couple of Mountain Dew Game Fuel Slurpees in his face and once moisture was returned to his eyeballs he was able to respond normally when I told him it was time for dinner.
    "Just a sec, Mom."
 
Google Smackdown of the Week
 
VS.
 
 
And the winner is "nothing matters" by 572,000.
 
Read Responsibly
  • A new book implies that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and his Spiritual cronies arranged the death of Houdini.
  • Two well-educated gentlemen in the aerospace industry have issued "An Introduction to Planetary Defense", telling the public how to prepare for alien invasion.
  • The first full biography of "anti-gravity pioneer" T. Townsend Brown clears up some of the mysteries of his life. (No, I don't know who he is either.)
  • In his article "PKD, The Unicorn and Operation Mind Control" Adam Gorightly sets forth a theory that Ira Einhorn was framed for the murder of Holly Maddox because he was about to unveil some Tesla technology. This ties in to Philip Dick. (Einhorn-framing theories don't wash with me, 'cause his girlfriend's putrid corpse was right in his own bedroom, leaking fluids into the apartment below. Even the smelliest hippie on the planet - and Einhorn was a contender for that title - must have noticed the funny smell coming from the closet...)
 
TRAVEL
Don't Go, You'll Ruin It
by David Schoen
 
My last trip to the Garden Isle of Kauai was like no other. I expected to see beautiful sunsets, smell the fresh tropical air and spend countless hours snorkeling while getting a terrific sunburn on my back. I did just that, but along with my normal activities I got to see the ground breaking for Costco and heard that Sams Club was coming to my Island.
 
Kauai, which used to be totally rural, now has just about every chain store and restaurant imaginable, Longs Drugs, KFC, Carls Jr., Burger King, etc., and they all produce piles of throw-away refuse cluttering up the landscape.
 
In addition to stores and eyesores, Kauai real estate is booming. They build everywhere on the island, no matter the consequences. Who cares about the frequent hurricanes and that land is being swallowed up by development. Where are the tree-huggers? How come they will chain themselves to a Redwood tree in California, but don't seem to be protesting the land developers and builders in Hawaii who use those cut-down trees to build and cover the land with houses, shopping centers and pavement? I had thought about retiring on my island sometime in the next century, but with all the development there, my special piece of land (three whole acres I picked out years ago), went from $60,000 to $ 6,000,000 in just eight short years.
 
And recently, Bette Midler, the Rose herself, was cutting down trees without a permit, just because she can. I thought that she was a lib. No state's more liberal than Hawaii...gay marriage and all, and it's still got more free stuff to do than all of the other islands, and things you DO have to pay for cost less. There are even bars where they'll pour you a free drink if you can correctly pronounce HUMU HUMU NUKU NUKU A' PU A'A, the State Fish of Hawaii that spits water at it's prey to stun it, but I'm not going to tell you where they are.
 
My only request is that if you're going.....don't! Kauai doesn't need any more people. You'll just mess it up for the rest of us. As long as I can get a room with a view off the ocean that's not clogged with tourists instead of some high-rise, I'm happy.
 
If you're going to Kauai, you had better get there before Bette cuts down all the trees and the Japanese economy gets better. There's nothing more distracting than a bus load of Japanese tourists with blonde hair on a bald island. For all you future protesters, you don't need a fancy hotel, just airfare. Then you can camp in the back country under a waterfall, bathe once a month, find pot farms, get killed and lead protests against America from the grave.
 
Let's hope global warming is real. If the fucking planet warms up, then we can all can skip the plane flight and go to the Farrallons off San Francisco for our tropical fix.
 
Don't Take Our Word for It
 
"You've probably already heard that the President plans to veto funding for the program which provides healthcare for kids whose parents work but can't afford insurance. (He wants to spend the money prolonging the Iraq occupation instead.) This is about as clear a chance to stand up for the kind of America we want as we could ask for, and we're pulling out all the stops."
 
    "Iraq is Enron, and President Bush is Ken Lay. He's fighting a war with phony accounting tricks. The Bush administration fudged the numbers to get us into Iraq, and cooked the books to keep us there. 'The surge' is simply another in a long series of inflated stock quotes. This past weekend Marcel Marceau passed away at age 84. Doctors say he went quietly. Thus proving that evil thrives when good men stay silent. And just like with Enron, the good men and women who are blowing the whistle on Iraq contractor fraud are being vilified, fired, demoted, and those are the lucky ones.
    "Last Friday morning the Senate Democratic Policy Committee held a hearing entitled 'The Mistreatment of Iraq Contracting Whistleblowers,' just in time to make the Friday news dump. According to the committee more than $10 billion dollars in Iraq reconstruction and military support contracts is unaccounted for. In other words, for every six dollars spent in Iraq one dollar is in question. And folks, it's a w