
How the "Walking on Water"
Shot in Being There
Actually
Got Made
by Michael Dare
![]()
The
script for Being There ends as both Peter Sellers and Shirley MacLaine
take walks in the wood. They run into each other. She says "I was looking
for you, Chance." He says "I was looking for you too." They take hands
and walk off together.
But
near the end of production, somebody went up to Hal and said "How's it
going?"
"Great,"
Hal said. "Sellers has created this character that's so amazing, I could
have him walk on water and people would believe it." Hal stopped and thought.
"As a matter of fact, I will have him walk on water."
Hal
was out on location, miles from Hollywood. The last thing on earth he needed
was to contact the home office to discuss the idea of Chance walking on
water. It's an idea that wouldn't pitch or read well. If it had been in
the script, there would have been endless arguments over what this Jesus
allegory was doing in the picture. Only if you've actually seen the film
do you realize that it's not a Jesus allegory at all. Chance can walk on
water because nobody ever told him he couldn't, not because he's the resurrection
of Christ.
Hal
knew he could make it work, just as he knew that there was no way in hell
the studio would approve of more money for such a controversial shot that
wasn't even in the script. He decided to do it anyway.
First,
he called Robert Downey, who had a scene in Greaser's Palace where
the main character walked on water. Hal knew that Downey didn't have a
lot of money, so he asked for advice on how to do it. Downey told him it
was simple. Just go to an airport, get a certain kind of platform, and
place it in the water. Hal followed Downey's advise and got the shot for
less than $10,000.
Second,
he had to deal with keeping the shot a secret. There was this one, very
well dressed kid around the set who was officially called a PA, but whom
Hal suspected of being the studio spy. Hal called him into his office and
read him the riot act.
"I'm
going to ask you to make a decision right now that's going to affect the
rest of your life," he told the kid. "I'm going to ask you to decided whose
side you're on. I know you've been watching me because you want to learn
how to make movies. I also know you're watching me to make reports to the
studio behind my back. I'm about to change the end of this movie because
I've come up with a better one. The studio can't know about it or they'll
shut me down. This is it, kid. Decide. Are you on the side of art or commerce?"
The
kid kept his mouth shut. The shot got made. The studio was pissed but they
used the shot anyway. Hal didn't give them a choice. He didn't even shoot
the ending in the script.
Why the Film was Released with Two Different Endings
Hal
always wanted to use a series of outtakes for the final credits. Obviously
that's one of the things you have to do at the last minute, because until
the final edit is locked down you don't know what the outtakes are. So
Hal handed in the film with the final credits over a compilation of TV commercials just to get the film
in on deadline, then got to work on the outtakes ending.
When
he tried to hand it in, the studio refused to accept it or send it out.
The film opened small, to just a half dozen theaters. Hal personally went
to each theater, went to the projection booth, knocked on the door and
said to the projectionist "Hi, I'm Hal Ashby, the director of the film.
The studio put in the wrong ending, but I've got the right one with me.
How about if we edit it in?" The projectionists were all thrilled to meet
him and gladly helped him out.
When
the studio found out, they got the last laugh. Hal's contract specifically
stated that he was to be paid his director's fee "upon proper delivery
of a completed film." They didn't consider receiving a film with two endings
"proper delivery," and they used that as an excuse not to pay him. Ten
years later, when I first met Hal, he still hadn't gotten paid for directing
Being There.
And the "outtakes" ending is the only one currently available.