In
the spring of 1969, the age of Aquarius was dawning every night on Broadway
where Hair and Oh Calcutta, two iconoclastic off-Broadway
shows, were mysteriously knocking out real Broadway audiences. Those cruising
for a new experience in film were likely to enter the strange underground
world of I am Curious, Yellow, or Monterey Pop, or Che!
When Midnight Cowboy opened in May, the United States was inexplicably
ready to identify with two low-life street hustlers who haven't a clue,
and it became an immediate sensation. It was a seedy tale of subsistence
in the streets that defied all conventional wisdom that "art" pictures
were supposed to be doomed to cult status. Despite it's X-rating (later
changed to an R), it not only attracted a wide audience, but won the Academy
Award that year for Best Picture.
It
has aged exceptionally well, and it answers two questions no one was asking:
Is it possible to do an accurate study in alienation and loneliness that's
funny? (Yes.) Can supposedly "in" New York jokes travel to the provinces?
(Yes, though this was the first to prove the depths of the rest of America's
fascination with the big apple.)
Look
at the scene where Ratso and Joe are almost hit by a cab while crossing
the street, and it's almost impossible to imagine why the original audiences
went bonkers just because Hoffman hits the hood of the cab and blurts "I'm
walking here!" By now we're used to street realism, and the incident seems
ordinary, but then it was a revelation, a miniscule detail of city life
that no one before had ever captured on film. And it's just one of thousands
of similar very specific occurrences that add up to one of the most painfully
realistic and humorous portraits of a city every conceived.
This
clearly wasn't an easy picture to put together. Though Hoffman was riding
on the success of The Graduate the previous year, Schlesinger was
recovering from the relative failure of Far From the Madding Crowd,
and the book Midnight Cowboy by James Leo Herlihy was decidedly
downbeat, and had been turned down by every major studio in 1965, including
United Artists, who eventually gave it a go in 1968.
Maybe
it took an outsider like the British born director John Schlesinger to
notice all the precisely deranged details of New York life, like a man
(corpse?) mysteriously lying on the sidewalk outside Tiffanys. It would
have seemed commonplace to a New York native. Schlesinger admits his previous
films, like Billy Liar and his documentaries for the BBC, were "never
about heroes but about cowards, not successes but failures." This one is
his most bonafide artistic tour-de-force, where his style is all-encompassing.
Despite the seemingly depressing subject matter, he maintains a constant
sense of irony and sarcasm; it's never maudlin despite the melodrama, and
there are more flashbacks in the first ten minutes than in every movie
made in the 80s.
It
opens with the sound of Cowboys while we're looking at the blank screen
of the Big Tex drive-in. Joe Buck (John Voight) shows up to his last day
of work in his cowboy duds, but his fellow workers say "What's with the
getup?" We know that even in Texas he wasn't a real cowboy. He gets on
a bus to New York City, armed with a new wardrobe and a poster of Paul
Newman, to fulfill a dream that will turn into a nightmare beyond his tiny
imagination. He's the most pathetic Candide imaginable.
Right
off, black & white and color footage intermingle as Joe's memories
and fantasies take over his mind. It's a literary technique that Schlesinger
utilizes to take total advantage of all the vast possibilities of cinema.
There are very dramatic uses of silence, jump cuts from day to night, and
stylish montages, ripe with meaning, that resonate throughout the picture.
Once
in New York, Joe inadvertently teams up with an unlikely character named
Ricco Rizzo, whom everyone calls Ratso, but we know as Dustin Hoffman.
Ratso lives in a condemned building of dreams that Joe eventually decides
to call home for the winter. Ratso's fantasies involve going to Florida
and simply being called by his correct name. Joe's fantasies involve proving
his studliness. Together, they not only never wallow in their misery, they
learn to love each other.
Hoffman
imbues Ratso with a humor and depth of humanity that's a wonder to behold.
There is absolutely nothing attractive about this character, yet we like
him. Mass audiences in 1969 had seen him for the first time in The Graduate,
where he played Benjamin, your basic nebbish. Hoffman had complained that
he didn't want to be "the Andy Hardy of the 60s," and he couldn't have
picked a follow-up part that was farther from what anyone expected. Imagine
Tom Cruise picking Quasimodo as a follow-up to Risky Business. Hoffman's
performance in Midnight Cowboy was much more impressive in comparison
to his previous role. Hoffman suddenly wasn't just a cute star, he was
a serious actor who could do anything.
In
contrast, Voight was an unknown, who gave a performance of such realism
that people couldn't tell it was a performance. One critic even complimented
Schlesinger on his skill in finding a cowboy who could act. Schlesinger
would then have to explain that Voight was actually an actor who wasn't
even from Texas, and that he learned his accent by taping interviews with
real Texans.
Once
production began, they had to arrange their shooting schedule around Hoffman's
matinee performances in Murray Schisgal's Jimmy Shine. The pace
was intense. At one point in shooting, Hoffman coughed with so much energy
that he actually threw up on the set. "Wow," said Voight, "How am I going
to upstage that?" Luckily, they left that bit of realism out of the picture,
so he didn't have to worry.
When
it opened on May 26, 1969, at the New York Coronet Theater, there was a
widespread media blitz. It followed a special release pattern that has
since become standard, playing New York months before anywhere else and
letting word of mouth spread throughout the country. It worked. In Midnight
Cowboy's first two days it broke the Coronet's record, which was set
the year before by The Graduate.
The
film was not without its detractors. Schlesinger was criticized for his
lack of self-discipline, many complained about the convoluted editing,
and one critical grump referred to the director as John Sledgehammer, but
even that didn't stop people from going. The film was a spectacular commercial
and critical success, with Time Magazine calling it an "act of rare skill
and rarer generosity" and critic Mick Billington describing it as a "Black
mosaic of the mod scene." It got a rare positive notice from the author
of the book, and even the New York Daily News, which Ratso uses as underwear
in Midnight Cowboy, gave Hoffman a good review.
Both Hoffman
and Voight were nominated for best actor, causing one of the most massive
split votes in Academy history. They were both beat out by the Duke in
True
Grit. Nevertheless, the image of Joe Buck and Ratso huddled in a doorway
was so indelibly stamped on everyone's mind, that two obscure exploitation
films of Hoffman and Voight,
Madigan's Millions and
Fearless
Frank, were immediately re-packaged as a double bill featuring that
Midnight
Cowboy couple together again.
Midnight
Cowboy is a triumph of style and substance. If you tire of the realism,
you can get into the pure technique. If you've had enough of artistic flash,
you can focus on the utterly unpredictable plot. Though the style puts
it squarely in the '60s, just look at Times Square or Hollywood Blvd. today
and you'll realize that nothing has changed. The film could take place
right now without a single modification. For some people, it's always midnight.
Return to Criterion Liner Notes